OPEN SCHOOLING AS A VECTOR OF POST-COLONIAL EDUCATIONAL TRANSFORMATION IN THE SAHEL: TOWARDS PEDAGOGICAL AND TECHNOLOGICAL DECOLONISATION

Authors

  • Karen FERREIRA-MEYERS Centre of Excellence in Learning and Teaching, University of Eswatini, Eswatini Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21109385

Keywords:

open schooling, Sahel, educational decolonisation, digital sovereignty, appropriate technologies, indigenous knowledge, pedagogical flexibility, post-colonial education, offline learning, community participation

Abstract

Across the Sahel, education systems remain profoundly shaped by colonial legacies that privilege centralized curricula, dominant foreign languages, and rigid school structures ill-suited to the realities of nomadic, displaced, and marginalized communities. These structural challenges intersect with contemporary crises — armed conflicts, climate shocks, recurrent school closures, and widespread poverty — severely limiting access to quality education. This article examines how open-schooling models, characterized by flexibility, community anchoring, and the use of appropriate technologies, can serve as transformative tools for post-colonial educational change in Burkina Faso, Chad, Mali, Mauritania, and Niger. Drawing on a mixed-methods approach that combines a comprehensive document review, decolonial theoretical frameworks, and findings from the 2023–2024 World Bank feasibility study, the article argues that open schooling enhances access, supports pedagogical continuity, integrates indigenous knowledge systems, and promotes digital sovereignty through low-tech and offline learning ecosystems. Results show that open schools can effectively respond to mobility patterns, security constraints, and linguistic diversity while strengthening community participation in educational governance. The article concludes by proposing a conceptual model linking educational decolonization, technological sovereignty, and pedagogical flexibility, highlighting open schooling as a cornerstone for building inclusive, resilient, and community-rooted education systems in the Sahel. The findings further underscore the need for context-specific policies, locally developed digital infrastructures, and sustained investment in teacher training to ensure the long-term viability of open-schooling initiatives across the region.

References

Akkari, A., & Radhouane, M. (2023). Learning in emergency contexts: From the building of the concept to multifaceted actions in the field. Prospects, 54(3–4), 659–676.

Akkari, A., & Vinuesa, V. (2023). Teaching and teachers in the Sahel countries by 2030: The need to innovate in the face of adversity. Prospects, 54(3–4), 585–603.

Antoninis, M. (2023). Global Education Monitoring Report 2023: Technology in education – A tool on whose terms? UNESCO.

Arribe, B. (2010). Les technologies appropriées. Coopération Concept.

Badaoui, A., & Najah, M. (2022). Intelligence artificielle et cyber-colonisation : implications sur l'Afrique. Policy Center for the New South (PCNS).

Beaufort, A. (2003). Les technologies appropriées : un choix politique. L'Harmattan.

Coalition Éducation. (2019). Relever les défis de l'éducation dans un Sahel en crise. Coalition Éducation.

Couldry, N., & Mejias, U. A. (2019). The costs of connection: How data is colonizing human life and appropriating it for capitalism. Stanford University Press.

Learning Equality. (2025). Kolibri: Offline-first learning platform.https://learningequality.org/kolibri

Maro, S. H., Jung, I., & Yoon, S. (2024). Deploying technology in refugee learning centers in Africa. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 25(2), 176–199.

Mawere, M. (2024). Digital colonialism in Africa: Sovereignty, data and the politics of technology. Langaa RPCIG.

Mbembe, A. (2016). Politiques de l'inimitié. La Découverte.

Mignolo, W. D. (2011). The darker side of Western modernity: Global futures, decolonial options. Duke University Press.

Ndassimba, N. G., et al. (2022). Digital school solution with MoodleBox in conflict zones: The Central African Republic case. Proceedings of ICACT 2022.

Ndiaye, S. (2024). Afrique : maîtriser l'IA ou renoncer à la souveraineté numérique. CIO Mag.

Ndlovu-Gatsheni, S. J. (2018). Epistemic freedom in Africa: Deprovincialization and decolonization. Routledge.

Ndlovu-Gatsheni, S. J. (2021). The cognitive empire, epistemic freedom, and the decolonization of knowledge. Routledge.

Ouedraogo, A. (2023). Appropriation des nouvelles médiations technopédagogiques : enjeux, contraintes et perspectives pour une éducation de qualité pour tous en Afrique. OpenEdition Journals.

Quijano, A. (2000). Coloniality of power, Eurocentrism, and Latin America. Nepantla: Views from South, 1(3), 533–580.

Schumacher, E. F. (1973). Small is beautiful: A study of economics as if people mattered. Blond & Briggs.

Spivak, G. C. (1988). Can the subaltern speak? In C. Nelson & L. Grossberg (Eds.), Marxism and the interpretation of culture (pp. 271–313). University of Illinois Press.

UNESCO. (2023). Technology in education: A tool on whose terms? Global Education Monitoring Report. UNESCO Publishing.

War Child. (2020). Can't wait to learn. War Child Holland.

WEBGRAM. (2025). La souveraineté numérique en Afrique : enjeux stratégiques, défis et opportunités pour une maîtrise continentale des données et des technologies. WEBGRAM.

World Bank. (2024). Delivering education in the midst of fragility, conflict, and violence. World Bank.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-27